[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slurs in 2.8
From: |
Artur Rataj |
Subject: |
Re: Slurs in 2.8 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:15:16 +0200 |
Hello.
I guess there might be some bugs: the 'minimum-length parameter
affects slurs made with ( ), but not slurs made with \( \). Byt the
way, what I thought is a slur, is perhaps a tie.
I know rather little about the music notation, this is why I do not
want to send the questions to the bugs list. I am just interested
whether the ties are ok or not. Perhaps they are so unequal on
purpose, if yes then I am simply interested in what that purpose is.
As of the small tie, I asked because I do not know if it is not too
small in comparison to the other objects -- it is much smaller than in
2.6, but perhaps not, as I said, I know rather little about the music
notation.
I am not sure if I can send .png files to this list, so but sending
the .png, I do some ASCII images:
These are two chords, exactly the same tones, connected with ties, and
the ties connect the notes symmetrically, relatively to the vertical
line. The ties are as follows:
* medium tie, reaching the middle of the note head, over
----
----
* long tie, going past the note head, over
|----
|-*-- short tie, not reaching the note head, under
|-*-- short tie, not reaching the note head, under
|-*-- medium tie, reaching the middle of the note head, under
|---
While I guess why there are short and medium ties, I do not understand
what is the long tie doing in the middle of the other ties. I am just
interested why this is done so.
The ties were equal in 2.6, and also the small tie was much larger,
and they are as I described in both versions 2.8.1 and 2.9.2.
Artur
notes.png
Description: PNG image