Re: Please ship GPLv3 in the tarball

[Vincent Untz]

Le jeudi 28 mai 2009, à 22:34 +0200, Simon Josefsson a écrit :
> Vincent Untz <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since some files in gsasl are GPLv3, I think it makes sense to ship
> > GPLv3 as COPYING and the LGPLv2.1 as COPYING.lib.
> 
> The LGPLv2.1+ files are all in lib/, and lib/COPYING is the LGPLv2.1
> license.  All the GPLv3+ files are in the top-level package, where
> COPYING is GPLv3.  Do you think that is sufficient?  I tried to clarify
> this in the top-level README, which now reads:

So, hrm, I'm looking at the libgsasl tarball and there, I only have
COPYING for LGPLv2.1. But the gltests directory contains GPLv3 stuff.

(sure, it's not needed for the library, but the tarball is not
LGPL-only -- it's arguably a minor thing ;-))

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.