Re: Advantage using mapc over dolist

[Heime]

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Wednesday, December 4th, 2024 at 5:55 AM, Tomas Hlavaty <tom@logand.com> 
wrote:

> On Tue 03 Dec 2024 at 19:40, Eli Zaretskii eliz@gnu.org wrote:
> 
> > If your only gripe is about the names of cl-case and cl-ecase, then
> > why mention pcase and cond*? they were not renamed and didn't come
> > from CL. And why is it "a mess"? You've made abundantly clear that
> > you didn't like the cl- names, why is there a need to add unrelated
> > accusations?
> 
> 
> in short, because people are directed to use pcase as the replacement
> for case and pcase-exhaustive as replacement for ecase


I agree.  Everyone is aware about the historical discouragement about cl
things, but we have no understanding if such discouragement is still relevant
today.  We need some certainty so we can adapt our code accordingly.