[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] Emulating the AMPL ord() function
From: |
Jason Foster |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] Emulating the AMPL ord() function |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:44:17 +0000 |
> While I understand your question, in the example that you gave do you really
> need ord(i) < ord(j), or can you suffice with i < j (which seems to work
> with your example)? Often all you need is any consistent ordering and not
> necessarily a specific one.
Agree completely.
So ... ummm ... does glpsol / glpk guarantee that for any given param or set
the "VAR in SET" construct will have a consistent ordering across multiple uses?
Jason
P.S. Thanks for the reply!