help-glpk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-glpk] var between 2 parameters


From: Paolo Tofoni
Subject: Re: [Help-glpk] var between 2 parameters
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:55:10 +0200

I follow your suggestions and I considered  the following situation:
 
 
var check_t1 {(m,k) in FERMI, (j,p,m) in V_TECNOLOGICI } binary;
param BigP :=  max {(j,p) in FERMI} fine_fermo[j,p];
 
 
s.t. k2 {(m,k) in FERMI, (j,p,m) in V_TECNOLOGICI}:
inizio_fermo[m,k] <= start[j,p,m] + BigP * check_t1[m,k,j,p];
 
s.t. k3 {(m,k) in FERMI, (j,p,m) in V_TECNOLOGICI}:
(start[j,p,m] + lt[j,p,m]) - BigP * check_t1[m,k,j,p]<= inizio_fermo[m,k];
 
where
 
start[j,p,m],   lt[j,p,m])  are vars and inizio_fermo[m,k] are parmas.
 
 I always obtain all vars set to 0 and the reponse:
 
OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOUND
Integer optimization begins...
Gomory's cuts enabled
MIR cuts enabled
Cover cuts enabled
Clique cuts enabled
Creating the conflict graph...
The conflict graph has 2*5 vertices and 9 edges
+   445: mip =     not found yet >=              -inf        (1; 0)
Warning: numerical instability (dual simplex, phase II)
Warning: numerical instability (dual simplex, phase II)
Cuts on level 0: gmi = 1; mir = 36; cov = 2;
Cuts on level 0: mir = 36; cov = 2;
Cuts on level 0: mir = 36; cov = 2;
+   620: mip =     not found yet >=     tree is empty        (0; 1)
PROBLEM HAS NO INTEGER FEASIBLE SOLUTION
 
but it's not the best solution ... what can I do to solve the issue?
Thanks in advance.
 
 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]