[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] info
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] info |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:10:47 +0400 |
> > * The routine ios_relative_gap computes the relative mip gap using the
> > * formula:
> > *
> > * gap = |best_mip - best_bnd| / (|best_mip| + DBL_EPSILON)
>
> > Beware: The mip gap may rise while you solution gets better:
>
> Ouch. Not a good formula.
This formula looks to be a standard one for computing the relative mip
gap (it is used in many other packages, e.g. cplex, gurobi, etc.; see,
for example,
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/cosinfoc/v12r4/index.jsp?topic=%2Filog.odms.cplex.help%2Frefcallablelibrary%2Fhtml%2Ffunctions%2FCPXgetmiprelgap.html
). By definition, the relative mip gap is the relative error
relerr = |z - z*| / |z*| ~= |z - z*| / |z|
between an approximation z (best_mip) and the exact optimum z*, which
being unknown is replaced by its estimation (best_bnd).
>
> > Integer optimization begins...
> > + 213: mip = not found yet <= +inf (1; 0)
> > + 481: >>>>> -4.000000000e+00 <= 7.000000000e+00 275.0% (10; 0)
> > + 875: >>>>> -3.000000000e+00 <= 2.600000000e+00 186.7% (15; 3)
> > + 1215: >>>>> -1.000000000e+00 <= 1.000000000e+00 200.0% (15; 11)
> > + 1397: mip = -1.000000000e+00 <= tree is empty 0.0% (0; 47)
> > INTEGER OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOUND
> >
> > The mip gap rose from 1.867 to 2. while the objective rose from -3 to -1
> > in this maximization problem.
>
> Perhaps this formula would be better:
> |best_mip - best_bnd|/|best_mip - root_bnd|,
> where root_bnd is the bound found at the root.
> It produces 0/0 if the root solution is feasible,
> but otherwise is non-increasing once one has a solution.
>
Probably this formula is better in the sense of monotonicity, however,
it would be more difficult to interprete corresponding values.
- Re: [Help-glpk] info,
Andrew Makhorin <=