[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] post-processing without defined variables?
From: |
glpk xypron |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] post-processing without defined variables? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:45:34 +0200 |
Hello Kevin,
either you can use the GLPK library from another programming language (C, Java,
...) or you can use scripting around glpsol, cf.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GLPK/Scripting_plus_MathProg
Best regards
Xypron
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:52:41 -0400
> Betreff: [Help-glpk] post-processing without defined variables?
> Hello GLPK List,
>
> I see from the GLPK Wikibook that there's no ability to create reporting
> variables (err, just learned that others call them "defined variables").
>
> https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GLPK/GMPL_Workarounds#Mimicking_an_AMPL_defined_variable
>
> I want to explore the last sentence in that section ("But you can use a
> structural variable and a constraint instead to achieve the same effect
> — the downside being that this formulation may render your problem
> harder to solve"). The models that I'm working with are necessarily
> large (roughly 1e5 [C] x 1e5 [R], give or take an order of magnitude
> depending on the input), and I'd like to avoid adding any more variables
> to the solver's matrix.
>
> Given that I can't create constraints /after/ a solve statement (i.e. to
> re-solve starting from the previous solution), does that mean that my
> only option is a post-GMPL step with another tool (e.g. C, Perl, Python)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-glpk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
- Re: [Help-glpk] post-processing without defined variables?,
glpk xypron <=