[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-glpk] [Fwd: N00b question: reverse engineering s.t. statement(s)]
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
[Help-glpk] [Fwd: N00b question: reverse engineering s.t. statement(s)] |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 03:45:41 +0300 |
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: goldford <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Help-glpk] N00b question: reverse engineering s.t.
statement(s)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:12:24 -0800 (PST)
hi, i have only a little experience with GLPK. I've followed a couple of
tutorials but now have to write a series of 'subject to' contraints and
equalities out in traditional mathematical/scientific notation. Could
anyone offer a little help interpreting this one?
UpZ{ i in I, k in O: (i,k) in Options}: z[i,k] <= Zmax[i,k]*x[i,k];
Where 'Options' is I Cross O, and
Zmax is a param, one (i,k) in Options.
I'm having trouble just writing this out logically, especially the left side
of the colon. Little help?
- [Help-glpk] [Fwd: N00b question: reverse engineering s.t. statement(s)],
Andrew Makhorin <=