[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations
From: |
Robbie Morrison |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations) |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 05:08:08 +1200 (NZST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.17 |
Hello all
------------------------------------------------------------
To: "Meketon, Marc" <address@hidden>
Subject: RE: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
From: Andrew Makhorin <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:18:04 +0400
------------------------------------------------------------
>> Many books call the min c'x, s.t. Ax=b, x>=0 form the
>> "canonical" linear programming program. The min c'x
>> s.t. Ax >= b, x>=0 is often called the "standard"
>> form, because it has more symmetry with the dual
>> (which is max b'y s.t. A'y<=c, y>=0). But I've
>> never heard it call the "augmented" form until I
>> googled it and found it in the wikipedia.
>
> Neither have I.
>
> [snip: remainder of post]
Okay. The draft text has now returned to "standard
format" and carries the following footnote:
"The LP terminology for equation types is
unfortunately inconsistent. This expression is also
referred to as the 'canonical form' and the term
'standard form' then applies to something else."
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Talk:GLPK/Solution_information#cite_note-0
I left the wikipedia link in place -- but I rather
suspect it will break sometime.
Sorry about the excursion into "augmented form".
Robbie
---
Robbie Morrison
PhD student -- policy-oriented energy system simulation
Technical University of Berlin (TU-Berlin), Germany
University email (redirected) : address@hidden
Webmail (preferred) : address@hidden
[from Webmail client]
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), (continued)
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Robbie Morrison, 2011/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/11
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Robbie Morrison, 2011/05/11
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Meketon, Marc, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Robbie Morrison, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Meketon, Marc, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations),
Robbie Morrison <=
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Meketon, Marc, 2011/05/12
- Re: [Help-glpk] optimality conditions paragraph (KKT and LP formulations), Andrew Makhorin, 2011/05/12