[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL
From: |
Andrew Makhorin |
Subject: |
RE: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:43:51 +0400 |
> Your example on Page 35 is even better.
That is what I meant, not that one on p.32. Sorry.
>
> Roughly, the out-of-kilter ran about 5 times faster than the
> simplex for the same problem, and took about 2/3rd's the memory.
I'd like to note that today the out-of-kilter algorithm is not a
best one for solving mincost. For example, RELAX-IV developed by
Prof. Bertsekas is much faster (even faster that the network
simplex). It is free software, so I plan to translate it to C and
include in glpk as a better alternative.
- [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL, Meketon, Marc, 2011/04/05
- Re: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL, Andrew Makhorin, 2011/04/05
- Re: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL, Meketon, Marc, 2011/04/05
- RE: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL, Meketon, Marc, 2011/04/06
- RE: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL,
Andrew Makhorin <=
- RE: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL, Meketon, Marc, 2011/04/06
- RE: [Help-glpk] DIMACS, mincost and GLPSOL, Andrew Makhorin, 2011/04/06