[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-glpk] Re: computational efforts, message level and KKT check
From: |
Ali Baharev |
Subject: |
[Help-glpk] Re: computational efforts, message level and KKT check |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:25:17 +0100 |
Hi Robbie,
Thanks for your response.
> int niter = lpx_get_int_parm(d_prob, LPX_K_ITCNT); // lpx is correct
>
> Are you sure the call is broken? But I agree, it would
> be better if the API was updated.
Last time I checked it always returned zero. Maybe I messed up something...
Anyhow, it would be nice to have a glp_get_int_parm function.
> If you need another work around, the terminal output records
> this information in line-oriented form .. which you could parse
> if truly desperate.
Not an option. I need the C API.
Note that I can fix these issues myself but I am looking for an
official solution.
Ali
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Ali Baharev <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> In my application I would like to get the computational efforts
> through the C API. In the previous releases I could use
> lpx_get_int_parm with LPX_K_ITCNT but it does not seem to work
> anymore. Please provide API functions to get the computational efforts
> such as iteration count.
>
> If I set the message level to GLP_MSG_ERR I still get the output of
> the scaling routines. Please disable this if the message level is
> warning and error messages only. (It is causing me problems.)
>
> Is there a reason why lpx_check_kkt is not glp_check_kkt? I use this
> function very often and I hope it will not be removed from the API.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Ali
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Help-glpk] Re: computational efforts, message level and KKT check,
Ali Baharev <=