[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Help-glpk] glpk49vb
From: |
Gottfried Lindner |
Subject: |
RE: [Help-glpk] glpk49vb |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:55:21 +0200 |
Hello Max,
I don't know why the VB version behaves in an other way than glpsol.
The return code from glpk_simplex is ok?
If you look at the c code of
int lpx_integer(LPX *mip)
(glplpx6c.c) you find at the beginning some conditions, where
LPX_E_FAULT = 204 is encountered. Can some condition be valid for your
problem?
Regards
Gottfried Lindner
Mail: address@hidden
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
address@hidden
Sent: Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 03:41
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Help-glpk] glpk49vb
I am have been using the VB implementation of GLPK for quite a while and
I am having the following problem. I write a problem in cplex format
and load the file as follows.
' load the problem from file
'
lp = glpk_read_cpxlp(sPath)
' Find Simplex solution
'
lRet = glpk_simplex(lp)
Print "GLPK SIMPLEX: " & lRet
' Find MIP solution
'
lRet = glpk_integer(lp)
Print "GLPK INTEGER: " & lRet
the glpk_integer returns an error of 204 - cannot start search.
but if I use glpsol.exe to test the formualtion it finds a mip solution
in less than a
second. So I am confident that the formulation is ok and that a mip
solution exists.
Has anyone got any ideas as to why the VB implemtation is returning an
error when glpsol.exe can find a solution with the same formulation.
Regards,
Max
_______________________________________________
Help-glpk mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk