[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Help-glpk] Suggestions for improvements
From: |
Shripad Thite |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Help-glpk] Suggestions for improvements |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:10:06 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> I've misunderstood you. If you write
>
> assert(lpx_simplex(lp) == LPX_E_OK);
>
> and the predicatum is false, the message will be following:
>
> Assertion failed: lpx_simplex(lp) == LPX_E_OK, ...
>
> i.e. just what you need. LPX_E_OK is replaced by a number in other
> place, not in the text passed to the assert macro. If you see something
> like "Assertion failed: lpx_simplex(lp) == 200, ...", the assert macro
> is incorrectly implemented.
That does seem to be the case. Which is interesting because I'm using
gcc 3.3.4. Sorry, I guess this isn't GLPK's fault. :)
Shripad