[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:27:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Arnoud Engelfriet <galactus@stack.nl> writes:
> On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>> But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
>> punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on
>> a business plan involving defrauding the customers and misappropriating
>> copyrighted material.
>
> Sounds like Google?
So where do they plead for reduced punitive damages because they never
intended to recompensate anybody in the first place?
> Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only
> for myself
Probably better that you speak for nobody else.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, (continued)
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, Tim Smith, 2007/11/24
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, David Kastrup, 2007/11/24
Re: SFLC files 2nd intimidation suit, John Hasler, 2007/11/24