[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:09:05 +0100 |
Cleaning personnel is not permitted to read unclosed material,
either. System administrators are not permitted to read mail that
they have legal access to. And so on. Physical access to content
does not imply permission to actually make use of the content in
the same manner as the owner of a copy.
You are missing the point, once again. It isn't just physical access
that is the requirement, but _LEAGL_ physical access.
And system administrators are infact allowed to read mail that they
have legal access to.
Cheers.
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Isaac, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, John Hasler, 2006/02/12
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/13
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/14