|
| From: | Bernd Jendrissek |
| Subject: | Re: GPL and other licences |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:22:19 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | tin/1.7.10-20050929 ("Tahay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.11.3 (i686)) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <43ECB98B.8FE88B42@web.de> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote: >You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing >independent works for all its components is indeed "still just a >compilation". But it now contains a derivative program (among other >computer program works) -- a derivative set of instructions to >eliminate FSF. So all compilations of independent works are also derivative works in their own right? Is that what you are saying? - -- "IBM has more patent litigation lawyers than SCO has employees." - unknown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Please fetch my new key 804177F8 from hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net/ iD8DBQFD8JV2wyMv24BBd/gRAkP4AJ0cg/WwaZ2etc9BF/hj8NFnp+8hVACfZasC vOGgolaXm7judcCWnUCC1po= =ubyp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |