Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

glue (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu Feb 22 2001 17:17:44 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• February 22, 2001
  • ., sb55sb55, 17:17
• February 14, 2001
  • glue님 안녕하세요?, Online Korea, 16:02
• February 13, 2001
  • Open Access Between Buyers and Sellers, 987987, 23:13
• February 09, 2001
  • Re: [discuss] Scope of GNU GLUE project [WWW Link], Sander Vesik, 13:56
  • Re: [discuss] Scope of GNU GLUE project [WWW Link], Michael Gerdts, 13:46
  • Re: [discuss] Scope of GNU GLUE project [WWW Link], Sander Vesik, 11:58
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: GROUPWARE - Anyone at Ximian or OO listening?, Sander Vesik, 11:09
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: GROUPWARE - Anyone at Ximian or OO listening?, Dan Kuykendall, 11:04
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: GROUPWARE - Anyone at Ximian or OO listening?, Sander Vesik, 08:42
  • Re: OpenOffice and GNU GLUE (was: Is GLUE active?), Markus Fleck, 07:57
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Thomas Aeby, 04:52
  • Re: Scope of GNU GLUE project [WWW Link], Michael Potter, 03:02
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Heinz-Josef Claes, 02:28
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Benny Li, 00:46
  • Re: [discuss] Congrats to Ximian/OO developers + more ammo!, Lloyd Llewellyn, 00:08
  • Re: GROUPWARE - Anyone at Ximian or OO listening?, Dan Kuykendall, 00:00
• February 08, 2001
  • GROUPWARE - Anyone at Ximian or OO listening?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 23:50
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 23:47
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Michael L. Dean, 23:47
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Lloyd Llewellyn, 23:41
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 23:40
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Lloyd Llewellyn, 23:17
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 23:16
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Lloyd Llewellyn, 23:00
  • Scope of GNU GLUE project [WWW Link], Markus Fleck, 21:56
  • Open Groupware Project Mailing List, Dan Kuykendall, 19:03
  • Please remove me from the list, Will Wong, 18:50
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 18:44
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 18:39
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it,anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 18:18
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Sander Vesik, 17:52
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Tom Cooper, 17:00
  • RE: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, John Murray, 16:36
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 16:32
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Sander Vesik, 15:51
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 15:33
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 15:30
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 15:30
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Lloyd Llewellyn, 15:13
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 15:08
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 15:04
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 14:14
  • OGS Project, Dan Kuykendall, 13:49
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE, Sander Vesik, 13:47
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Dan Kuykendall, 13:41
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 13:32
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 13:31
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Thomas Aeby, 13:30
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 13:23
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 13:18
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 13:12
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 13:00
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE, Dan Kuykendall, 12:55
  • Re: GROUPWARE, Dan Kuykendall, 12:45
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 12:39
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Dan Kuykendall, 12:35
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 12:00
  • GROUPWARE, Lloyd Llewellyn, 11:56
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE, Sander Vesik, 11:42
  • Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Sander Vesik, 10:39
  • GROUPWARE - Answered: Why "OOGS" ?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 10:03
• February 07, 2001
  • Re: [Evolution] CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, srl, 13:25
  • ., hk67hk89, 11:24
• February 06, 2001
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison- was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Dan Kuykendall, 23:51
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison-was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Dan Kuykendall, 23:48
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison- was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Shane Landrum, 21:50
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison- was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Sander Vesik, 18:41
  • Re: [discuss] Re: CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Sander Vesik, 18:27
  • Re: CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 15:43
  • Re: CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, Dan Kuykendall, 15:39
  • CALL FOR SPONSORSHIP: The Open Group Ware Project, David A. Cobb, 15:36
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison - was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Dan Kuykendall, 15:15
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison - was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Jeffry Smith, 15:10
  • Re: [Evolution] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison- was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Dan Kuykendall, 02:50
• February 05, 2001
  • Buying a home? Self employed? Hard to qualify? 1264, SimonTeller435989142, 17:08
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison - was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Garrett Mickelson, 16:27
  • Re: GNU GLUE?, Thomas Aeby, 15:40
  • Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] OO - GROUPWARE - Call for concluison - was: OpenOffice: Say it isn't so., Lloyd Llewellyn, 15:02
• February 03, 2001
  • Re: GNU GLUE?, Dan Kuykendall, 06:19
  • Re: GNU GLUE?, Thomas Aeby, 05:26

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc