[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [glob2-devel] hg :((( / opinions on conversion code fix
From: |
Leo Wandersleb |
Subject: |
Re: [glob2-devel] hg :((( / opinions on conversion code fix |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:18:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081018) |
Kai Antweiler wrote:
> I would need more information for a good answer.
> I can't look at our repository structure until weekend and by then it
> won't look the same anyway.
Hmm... it was more about telling you that I didn't spawn heads without caring
than that I would need investigation. Don't complain if I did anything wrong,
but explain. If I didn't do anything wrong the better it is. It just looked
wrong to me.
> Here some thoughts that you might have already checked yourself:
>
> What do you mean by "pushing a change to default"?
> Is there no chance, that you pushed a changeset of another branch as well?
>
> Did you use "hg outgoing" to get more information before forcing that push?
yes. hg outgoing only knew about one changeset.
>> why do i have to merge manually when i do a merge??
>> hg update -C -r 411f53fbb28b && hg merge -r a2d2baad1919
>
> I don't know.
> Is "hg update -C -r 411f53fbb28b && hg diff -r a2d2baad1919" helpful?
>
> Does the next line work better?
> "hg revert -a -r 411f53fbb28b && hg update -C -r 411f53fbb28b && hg
> diff -r a2d2baad1919"
Hmm.. forget that. the actual problem is that 3way merge tools like meld always
confuse me as they show me 3 versions and allow me to edit all three what makes
no sense to me when i want to merge to one final version. naming of the files
leaves me clueless, too.
greets and thanx for caring ;)