Re: [glob2-devel] scripting language

[Bo Lorentsen]

address@hidden wrote:

> Actually, no. The DotGNU Portable.NET guys have written a paper about efficient
> bytecode execution and it looks like the the fastest is to store the address of
> the method as the opcode and jump directly to the code of the next instruction
> after executing the current one (a method called computed gotos).
>  
Sounds much like the old forth language, but I still hav'nt seen the 
possibilite to make an array of goto labels in C :-)

/BL