|
From: | Spyros Roum |
Subject: | Re: Add completion to compilation-read-command |
Date: | Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:11:52 +0000 |
Philip Kaludercic wrote:
You are right, I have initiated the process.Also, I'm wondering if this counts as non-trivial enough that I would need to sign the FSF copyright.It looks like it to me, and either way it is not bad to do that so that you have it behind you for future contributions either to Emacs or ELPA. Regarding testing, as far as I can tell, there are currently no tests for `compilation-read-command`. Should I add anything? If yes, I'll probably need someone to point to existing tests for similar things that I can copy from.You could take a look at test/lisp/progmodes/compile-tests.el, but I don't think this breaks the patch, especially when dealing with something as interactive as what you are proposing. I did check compile-tests.el and found no references to
`compilation-read-command`, Am I forgetting anything else? >From e1068206662913978d541f924205a0615f8d2d95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Spyros Roum <spyros.roum@posteo.net> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:32:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add option for making compilation-read-command use completing-readA ChageLog style commit message would be expected here as well. You can inject the structure in vc-mode using C-c C-w. I'm not sure the level of detail I should go in describing each function I touch, so I wrote (what I think is) a lot. Let me know if it's not necessary or if it's fine as is. I did see some examples from the wiki/other commits and I think it's fine. + "Function used by `compilation-read-command' to get user's input. +Defaults to `compilation-prompt-read-shell-command', +but `compilation-prompt-read-command-with-completion' can be used instead forIf possible, avoid the passive phrase here. I changed it to active voice. I'll also say I'm not a native
speaker, so if you think I've attached a new draft based on your feedback. Additionally, I've renamed the new function to something that describes that completion happens based on history, according to Juri's input. One additional question: The NEWS file is for version 31.1. Should the `:version` tag also be for 31.1 instead of 31? |
0001-Add-option-for-making-compilation-read-command-use-c.patch
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |