[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pdumper on Solaris 10
From: |
Pip Cet |
Subject: |
Re: pdumper on Solaris 10 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:43:02 +0000 |
"Paul Eggert" <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:
> On 2024-12-15 03:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:55:49 +0000
>>> From: Pip Cet<pipcet@protonmail.com>
>>>
>>> "Eli Zaretskii"<eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> CC igc.o
>>>> igc.c: In function 'weak_hash_table_entry':
>>>> igc.c:4102:16: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
>>>> [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>>>> 4102 | client = (mps_addr_t)entry.intptr;
>>>> | ^
>>>> igc.c:4107:16: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
>>>> [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>>>> 4107 | client = (mps_addr_t)real_ptr;
>>>> | ^
> ...
>>> What's the preferred way of avoiding a compiler warning in this case?
>>> A simple double cast (first to uintptr_t, then to mps_addr_t) should
>>> work, right?
>> I'll defer to Paul (CC'ed), but my personal preference is also to
>> explicitly reset the ignored bits by bitwise AND.
>
> The usual way I avoid such warnings is a single cast of the pointer to
> uintptr_t (or to intptr_t, if the eventual destination is signed).
> There is no need for two casts, or for a bitwise AND, and I usually
In this case, the eventual destination is a pointer, so I don't see how
a single cast would work. Changing mps_addr_t to be an integer seems a
bit drastic.
(The change I'm currently using does use an intermediate uintptr_t
variable, but it's still two casts).
Pip
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, (continued)
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/12/10
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/11
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/11
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/14
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/15
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/15
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/15
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/15
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, John ff, 2024/12/15
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Paul Eggert, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10,
Pip Cet <=
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Paul Eggert, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Paul Eggert, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/09
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Po Lu, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/18
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/08
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Po Lu, 2024/12/08