emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#63531: closed ([PATCH] View DICOM and Sixel images using image-conve


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#63531: closed ([PATCH] View DICOM and Sixel images using image-convert)
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 03:09:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2024 03:07:00 +0000
with message-id 
<CADwFkmn+k=DdrVPmZbB-2sXVHnTS5NANA-aGtBN=KL=aLzTcUg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#63531: [PATCH] View DICOM and Sixel images using 
image-convert
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #63531,
regarding [PATCH] View DICOM and Sixel images using image-convert
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
63531: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63531
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] View DICOM and Sixel images using image-convert Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 23:30:13 +0000
These patches add .dcm and .six to auto-mode-alist, so they can be
viewed with image-convert. The Six patch also adds SIX as an ImageMagick
type.

Attachment: 0001-Allow-viewing-.six-images-via-image-convert.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: 0002-Allow-viewing-.dcm-images-via-image-convert.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#63531: [PATCH] View DICOM and Sixel images using image-convert Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 03:07:00 +0000
Version: 31.1

Antero Mejr <antero@mailbox.org> writes:

> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Since these formats are not encumbered by patents and so on, I don't see
>> any reason why we can't support them.  It's always nice if stuff like
>> that works OOTB.
>>
>> So I think we should install these patches.
>
> I agree, both are popular formats so it would be good to support them.
> I did another check regarding the licenses, hopefully it will address
> the previous concerns.
>
> The DICOM standard committee website explicitly states:
> "No license is required to download or implement the DICOM Standard."
> https://www.dicomstandard.org/patent
>
> For Sixel, we already use the DEC VTxxx manuals for terminal emulation,
> see the "References" comment on line 2975 of term.el. The Sixel file
> format reference comes from the same sources.

Now installed on master.  Thanks!


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]