[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep on Hackernews
From: |
Andreas Fink |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep on Hackernews |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:19:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.53 |
H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote on 17.12.21 10:57:
>
>> Am 17.12.2021 um 10:33 schrieb Andreas Fink <afink@list.fink.org>:
>>
>> packages in Debian are quite old and don't support objc2.0. So they are
>> not suitable for new development.
>> I always build my own packages due to that.
> That is why I propose the idea to provide a separate, maintained repository
> outside of debian.org
> but compatible to it...
>
> People just
> 1. add some /etc/apt/sources.list.d/gnustep.conf to e.g. deb.gnustep.org (see
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository)
> 2. download and install some GPG key
> 3. then apt-get update
> 4. and apt-get install gnustep
> 5. later apt-get upgrade
>
> Same can be done for Ubuntu.
>
> So if you already build your own packages, why not publish them in such a
> repo? Incl. objc2.0?
it is public already. I use it heavily in my ulib library and all
libraries based on top of it (such as universalss7).
Add the repo key:
wget -4 -O - http://repo.universalss7.ch/debian/key.asc |apt-key add -
or
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com
EE85CFC98EC405E3115EE86BD173212BFB27007D # UniversalSS7
add the repository to your /etc/apt/sources.list
Debian10
deb http://repo.universalss7.ch/debian/ buster universalss7
Debian 11
deb http://repo.universalss7.ch/debian/ bullseye universalss7
I can built for Intel and arm64
I also built one for Ubuntu a while back.
Not much difference.
The versions in my repo are built for my own use and thus are installed
in /usr/local/ to not interfer with anything installed from other sources.
I can build a release version for debian 10 or 11 if I know how the
original packages where built.
(what config otions etc)
>
>> Btw who is the Debian maintainer for the gnustep builds?
> In my proposal it could be a member of the GNUstep community so we don't have
> to wait
> for someone from Debian core...
I agree but "someone from Debian core" must be someone who built it
originally. The config of these builds is what interests me.
>
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>
>
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Xavier Brochard, 2021/12/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Xavier Brochard, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Riccardo Mottola, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Xavier Brochard, 2021/12/18
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2021/12/18
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2021/12/16
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Andreas Fink, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews,
Andreas Fink <=
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Andreas Fink, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Riccardo Canalicchio, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Riccardo Mottola, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Riccardo Mottola, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Riccardo Mottola, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Riccardo Mottola, 2021/12/17
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Liam Proven, 2021/12/19
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Ivan Vučica, 2021/12/22
- Re: GNUstep on Hackernews, Liam Proven, 2021/12/22