[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Installer.app feedback
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
RE: Installer.app feedback |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:42:07 -0400 |
There's no point in coming up with a new packaging format - you just have to
solve all the same problems that everyone else has. Probably there should be a
bundle that installs from source though,
-----Original Message-----
From: Björn Giesler [mailto:giesler@ira.uka.de]
Sent: Wed 6/23/2004 9:31 AM
To: fsmunoz@gesal.org
Cc: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Installer.app feedback
Hi,
Am 23.06.2004 um 15:05 schrieb Frederico Muñoz:
> The main idea - and what is actually already done - is this: for each
> packaging format there is a bundle.
Does that mean that the installer handles different packaging formats,
such as .deb, .rpm etc.?
Your proposal sounds reasonable; however: Since GNUstep is a software
system that has no need for the complicated packaging convolutions that
traditional Unix software needs, and is quite distinct from the
surrounding Unix/Windows environment, wouldn't it be more sound to
leave RPMs etc. quite alone and create a much simpler format just for
GNUstep?
Regards,
Björn
--
Dipl.-Inform. Björn Giesler <giesler@ira.uka.de>
Web: http://wwwiaim.ira.uka.de/~giesler
Tel: +49-721-608-8308 Fax: +49-721-608-8270
Augmented Reality, 3D User Interfaces, Machine Vision, Robotics
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
Re: Installer.app feedback, Peter Cooper, 2004/06/23
- RE: Installer.app feedback,
Adam Fedor <=