[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #60399] Incorrect dependencies with grouped targets
From: |
Sean Anderson |
Subject: |
[bug #60399] Incorrect dependencies with grouped targets |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:17:57 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:85.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/85.0 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60399>
Summary: Incorrect dependencies with grouped targets
Project: make
Submitted by: callous_stream
Submitted on: Thu 15 Apr 2021 06:17:55 PM UTC
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: Bug
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Component Version: 4.3
Operating System: POSIX-Based
Fixed Release: None
Triage Status: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
The following makefile demonstrates some unexpected (buggy?) behavior
.PHONY: FORCE
b: FORCE
a b&:
touch a
touch b
What I expected to happen was
* Running "make a" for the first time would run the recipe.
* Running "make a" when "a" already existed would do nothing.
* Running "make b" would always run the recipe.
Instead, I observe the following behavior:
$ make --trace a
Makefile:4: target 'a' does not exist
touch a
touch b
$ make --trace b
Makefile:4: update target 'b' due to: FORCE
touch a
touch b
$ make --trace a
Makefile:4: target 'a' does not exist
touch a
touch b
In this example, "FORCE" is used to represent some dependency of "b" which has
been updated since the last run of "make". However, this behavior is also
present if "FORCE" is replaced by some regular file which is updated between
"make" runs.
If the makefile is modified slightly to
.PHONY: b
a b&:
touch a
touch b
Then I observe the following behavior:
$ make --trace a
Makefile:3: target 'a' does not exist
touch a
touch b
$ make --trace b
Makefile:3: target 'b' does not exist
touch a
touch b
$ make --trace a
make: 'a' is up to date.
>From this, it seems that "a" is incorrectly marked as ".PHONY" in the first
example. I'm not sure whether this is intended (albeit strange) behavior, or a
bug.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60399>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #60399] Incorrect dependencies with grouped targets,
Sean Anderson <=