[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues
From: |
Preethi Selvaraju |
Subject: |
RE: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:53:43 +0000 |
Thank you Team. I tried jdk8u and it works fine. I don’t see that issue.
Thanks for pointing it out.
~Preethi
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Smith <psmith@gnu.org>
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 8:22 PM
To: Martin Dorey <Martin.Dorey@hitachivantara.com>; Preethi Selvaraju
<preethi.s@hcl.com>; bug-make@gnu.org
Subject: Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 14:17 +0000, Martin Dorey wrote:
> Looks a likely match for:
>
> https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail.
> openjdk.java.net%2Fpipermail%2Fbuild-dev%2F2014-November%2F013597.html
> &data=02%7C01%7Cpreethi.s%40hcl.com%7C5780e124ac11417cb4ce08d81c3b
> ef8d%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C637290391044631321&a
> mp;sdata=XIfpUkC2VzCOkCjIvmWJziv9vNHn%2F1P0HaycsbpPAEU%3D&reserved
> =0
>
> Fixed in jdk8u in 2014. Surely our OP is using that already... but he
> does say jdk8 rather than jdk8u, so maybe not.
Why do they do this super-bizarre hacking of flags?
Anyway, they should be using MAKEFLAGS not MFLAGS if they want to be portable.
MFLAGS is not POSIX.
::DISCLAIMER::
________________________________
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission.
The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore
not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or
opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and
may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any
form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written
consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender
immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for
viruses and other defects.
________________________________
- make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Preethi Selvaraju, 2020/06/29
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Paul Smith, 2020/06/29
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Martin Dorey, 2020/06/29
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Paul Smith, 2020/06/29
- RE: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues,
Preethi Selvaraju <=
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Martin Dorey, 2020/06/29
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Paul Smith, 2020/06/29
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Dmitry Goncharov, 2020/06/29
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Paul Smith, 2020/06/29
- RE: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Preethi Selvaraju, 2020/06/30
- Re: make4.3/make4.2.1 - solaris 11 x86 issues, Paul Smith, 2020/06/30