Re: Tail call elimination

[Pete Dietl]

> Both a Lisp-like prefix syntax and a Forth/RPN-like postfix syntax are
> concise and easy to implement.  Infix semantics are messy, because they
> require special "order of operations" logic to resolve ambiguities, and
> there is no universal standard for that.

Oh I completely agree.
I think that the prefix syntax could take the most advantage of
existing Make code
and would be consistent with the existing Make function syntax.