[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string comparison operators (was: Re: Tail call elimination)
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: string comparison operators (was: Re: Tail call elimination) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2020 17:49:50 -0400 |
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 16:01 -0500, Pete Dietl wrote:
> I concur that string handling and comparison should be considered in
> a separate discussion.
>
> So let’s consider just integer comparison and arithmetic here?
The usual method is someone makes a concrete proposal (say, something
on the same level of detail that we'd add to the user's manual, along
with implementation notes if there is anything that isn't obvious
--unlikely in this situation) and then we can critique it.
- Re: Tail call elimination, (continued)
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Jouke Witteveen, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Tim Murphy, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Paul Smith, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Tim Murphy, 2020/05/18
- string comparison operators (was: Re: Tail call elimination), Paul Smith, 2020/05/18
- Re: string comparison operators (was: Re: Tail call elimination), Pete Dietl, 2020/05/18
- Re: string comparison operators (was: Re: Tail call elimination),
Paul Smith <=
- Re: Tail call elimination, Daniel Herring, 2020/05/18
- Re: Tail call elimination, Paul Smith, 2020/05/19
- Re: Tail call elimination, Tim Murphy, 2020/05/19
- math expressions (was: Re: Tail call elimination), Paul Smith, 2020/05/19
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/20
- Re: Tail call elimination, Daniel Herring, 2020/05/20
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/20
- Re: Tail call elimination, Paul Smith, 2020/05/20
- Re: Tail call elimination, Pete Dietl, 2020/05/20
- Re: Tail call elimination, Paul Smith, 2020/05/20