|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: "make distcheck" fails |
Date: | Sat, 11 Jul 2020 13:50:33 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
On 7/11/20 4:15 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
I can reproduce it on an Ubuntu 16.04.x machine:
m4.c:166:1: error: function might be candidate for attribute 'pure' if it is known to return normally [-Werror=suggest-attribute=pure] fault_handler (int signo) ^
...
It is not clear to me whether the function 'fault_handler' should be marked with attribute 'pure' or not.
'pure' does sound dicey, as the intent is for 'pure' to be useful to a compiler when doing optimization and it's satisfying that intent, but on the other hand the function does have side effects visible to the caller.
Anyway, GCC 10.1 doesn't issue the diagnostic for me, I hope because GCC has been improved since the GCC 5 that comes with Ubuntu 16.04. So I hope we can leave this alone, as we can assume that whoever prepares m4 distributions has a more-modern GCC.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |