Re: NCR MP-RAS and 1.913

[Gary V . Vaughan]

Bonjour Edouard,

Thanks for the report, and my apologies for taking so long to action it.

On Thursday 03 May 2001  3:40 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2001, Robert Boehne <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The functions mutex_lock and mutex_unlock are not
> > defined by libltdl, only used by it.
>
> Actually, these are just pointers to functions, that are indeed
> defined in libltdl.  We should probably move them into the libtool
> namespace, prepending lt_dl and appending _fn to their names.  Ditto
> (prepending only) for last_error, and any other static variables we
> should use.

Done.  Though I used `_func' as the suffix.

> Edouard, I'm curious...  Why did you choose to append `_cb' to their
> names?  I can't make any sense out of `cb' :-)

It is a Motif ideom to mark _callback_ functions with a CB suffix...

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk        ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool   \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook    =`---d__/