Re: incorrect definition of no_undefined_flag on solaris?

[Diab Jerius]

I can verify that Solaris 2.4 and SunOS 5.2 (which should be Solaris
2.2) both have the -z defs flag.

On 23 Mar, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2001, Diab Jerius <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> The "-z text" part comes from the definition in libtool for
>> no_undefined_flag.  I don't think this is the correct definition.
>> I believe it should be "-z defs".
> 
> That's correct.  Fixing this has been in my to-do list forever.
> However, I need to know whether -z defs is available in earlier
> versions of Solaris before I do that.  The oldest version of Solaris
> I've got is 2.5.  Does anybody know about earlier releases?
> 

-- 
Diab Jerius                       Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
                                  60 Garden St, MS 70, Cambridge MA 02138 USA
address@hidden           vox: 617 496 7575         fax: 617 495 7356