[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Possible Bug in ltconfig?
From: |
Bill Wendling |
Subject: |
Possible Bug in ltconfig? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:54:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi,
I was looking at the ltconfig file and the dlopen stuff and saw this
which looks like it might be a bug. When testing if there's a dlopen in
-ldl, it saves the LIBS macro, but whether or not the test succeeds, the
LIBS macro is reset to it's previous state. The patch below resets it
only if it fails...
--- ltconfig Sat May 27 06:15:00 2000
+++ /mnt/sdt/wendling/eirene/hdf5/bin/ltconfig Mon Jan 29 17:50:27 2001
@@ -2270,13 +2284,13 @@
rm -rf conftest*
eval "ac_cv_lib_$ac_lib_var=yes"
else
+ LIBS="$ac_save_LIBS"
echo "$progname: failed program was:" >&5
cat conftest.$ac_ext >&5
rm -rf conftest*
eval "ac_cv_lib_$ac_lib_var=no"
fi
rm -f conftest*
-LIBS="$ac_save_LIBS"
fi
if eval "test \"`echo '$ac_cv_lib_'$ac_lib_var`\" = yes"; then
--
|| Bill Wendling address@hidden
|| Coding Simian
- Possible Bug in ltconfig?,
Bill Wendling <=