bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#54691: [PATCH] gnu: fortune-mod: Remove off database.


From: Liliana Marie Prikler
Subject: bug#54691: [PATCH] gnu: fortune-mod: Remove off database.
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 15:46:31 +0200
User-agent: Evolution 3.42.1

Am Samstag, dem 16.07.2022 um 15:40 +0200 schrieb Csepp:
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
> 
> > merge 56599 54691
> > thanks
> > 
> > Am Samstag, dem 16.07.2022 um 14:21 +0200 schrieb raingloom:
> > > * gnu/packages/games.scm (fortune-mod): Delete off database after
> > > install phase.
> > > ---
> > >  gnu/packages/games.scm | 5 ++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm
> > > index 713f9339b2..cf10ebc9b6 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/games.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/games.scm
> > > @@ -7721,7 +7721,10 @@ (define-public fortune-mod
> > >                   (lambda _
> > >                     (with-directory-excursion #$output
> > >                       (rename-file "games/fortune" "bin/fortune")
> > > -                     (rmdir "games")))))))
> > > +                     (rmdir "games"))))
> > > +               (add-after 'install 'commit-censorship
> > > +                 (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> > > +                   (delete-file-recursively (string-append
> > Truly offensive files should be removed with a snippet rather than
> > a funnily named phase.  I'm not sure if this applies to all of off,
> > but let it be said, that there's plenty of fortunes that'd violate
> > the CoC in files not labeled as such.  Some files could probably be
> > salvaged if we only removed some quotes – for example limericks
> > about numbers are probably fine, but other limericks aren't. 
> > Furthermore, we should also revise the list of fortunes not in off,
> > men-women is just an alternate spelling of sexism.
> > 
> > Cheers
> 
> That's probably better done as a fork of upstream. If no one wants to
> do that, I wouldn't miss the package if it got yeeted. :shrug:
I'm not necessarily asking you to go over joke for joke; that would
need to be a collective decision of Guix folk anyway.  Right now I just
want to (1) make that a snippet and (2) also take a critical look at
the files not labeled "offensive". 

Cheers





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]