[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store.
From: |
Roel Janssen |
Subject: |
bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store. |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:53:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Hi Roel,
>>>
>>> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>>>
>>>> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>> actual-error:
>>>>>>> + (srfi-34
>>>>>>> + #<condition &nix-protocol-error [message: "path
>>>>>>> `dtmp/guix-tests/store/462z3fnl7bs44vp9s97jyg1z74nsfvly-tar' is not in
>>>>>>> the Nix store" status: 1] 1071090>)
>>>>>>> result: FAIL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The “dtmp” bit (instead of “/tmp”) looks fishy and would suggest a
>>>>>> memory corruption, presumably in the daemon.
>>>>>
>>>>> The daemon used in the test, or the daemon used to do the package build?
>>>>
>>>> The daemon under test (within the build environment).
>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose the failure random, isn’t it?
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran it again, and I've got the same error:
>>>>>
>>>>> actual-error:
>>>>> + (srfi-34
>>>>> + #<condition &nix-protocol-error [message: "path
>>>>> `dtmp/guix-tests/store/462z3fnl7bs44vp9s97jyg1z74nsfvly-tar' is not in
>>>>> the Nix store" status: 1] 1754ed0>)
>>>>>
>>>>> So that's either a very funny coincidence, or it's a structural problem.
>>>>
>>>> It’s better if it’s not random. :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Do you have any suggestions for how I can debug this problem?
>>>>
>>>> Assuming the failure also happens when you run “make check” outside the
>>>> build container (in the failed build tree), can you add ‘valgrind’ in
>>>> ‘test-env’? Specifically, in ‘test-env’, look for the line that invokes
>>>> ‘./pre-inst-env guix-daemon’ and change it to ‘./pre-inst-env valgrind
>>>> guix-daemon’.
>>>
>>> Did you manage to gather more info?
>>
>> No. When I run "make check -k" many tests fail.
>
> In a fresh checkout? If many tests fail, then there’s probably
> something wrong with the environment, such as guix-daemon failing to
> start or something. Could you check the logs?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
Indeed. I found out that guix-daemon couldn't start because I didn't
set --localstatedir properly. I "make check" again and that yields the
same issue with tests/store.scm.
However, upon changing test-env to include valgrind, more tests fail
again because of a problem accessing the daemon-socket.
So I manually started the guix-daemon with --disable-chroot and
prepended valgrind --leak-check=full to it. Then I ran:
$ guile -s tests/store.scm
Which yielding many more failures.
Then:
$ make check
Which also yielded more test failures. But at least I have a valgrind
log now, which I uploaded here:
https://www.roelj.com/guix-daemon-valgrind.log.gz
I don't think the memory problem is in the log, but at least it shows
that we should have a look at the memory allocation of guix-daemon.
Sometimes it seems to leak memory.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Roel Janssen, 2017/12/12
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/12
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Roel Janssen, 2017/12/12
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/12
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/20
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Roel Janssen, 2017/12/21
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/21
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store.,
Roel Janssen <=
- Message not available
- bug#29676: Guix test failure on tests/store., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/22