[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#27943: tar complains about too-long names (guix release)
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
bug#27943: tar complains about too-long names (guix release) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:20:59 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Maybe ‘lint-hidden-vulnerabilities’ or ‘hidden-vulnerabilities’, or
> ‘ignored-vulnerabilities’, or…? What’s you preference? :-)
I like 'lint-hidden-vulnerabilities' because it communicates that we are
"hiding" a vulnerability somehow and that it's related to the linter.
Maybe even 'lint-hidden-cve', since it's really about the CVE system and
not so much about vulnerabilities as vulnerabilities.
> Would you be OK with a more appropriate name and the understanding that
> it’s there to address rare cases like this one?
Yes, definitely!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature