[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#29363: Single test failure building Guix |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:47:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
> Rutger Helling <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> when building Guix with 'guix build guix' I keep running into a single
>> test failure. I've attached the test-suite.log.
>
> Is this a Btrfs system by any chance, possibly on an SSD?
>
>> test-name: dead path can be explicitly collected
>> location:
>> /tmp/guix-build-guix-0.13.0-10.0b4c385.drv-0/source/tests/store.scm:178
>> source:
>> + (test-assert
>> + "dead path can be explicitly collected"
>> + (let ((p (add-text-to-store
>> + %store
>> + "random-text"
>> + (random-text)
>> + '())))
>> + (let-values
>> + (((paths freed) (delete-paths %store (list p))))
>> + (and (equal? paths (list p))
>> + (> freed 0)
>> + (not (file-exists? p))))))
>> actual-value: #f
>> result: FAIL
>
> I can reproduce this error on two different systems that have
> Btrfs+LUKS+SSD, and the problem is that freed == 0.
If you comment out (> freed 0), does the test pass?
> I suspect it's related to Btrfs' "lazy" reporting of disk space, but
> haven't dug very far.
>
> Until we figure out what's going on, I suggest applying the patch
> below. Can you confirm that it works on your system?
>
> From bdc7b5310111e21801529ea57e290f6eb72ac6ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:27:08 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guix: Disable test that fails on Btrfs.
>
> Works around <https://bugs.gnu.org/29363>.
> Reported by Rutger Helling <address@hidden>.
>
> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Rename
> 'disable-container-tests' phase to 'disable-failing-tests' and add
> substitution
> to disable "dead path can be explicitly collected" test.
Alternately, we could comment out (> freed 0) if that’s enough, with a
comment explaining why, and do “make update-guix-package”. That way
we’d avoid the extra build phase.
WDYT?
Thanks for finding out the root cause!
Ludo’.