[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gperf] switch fallthrough
From: |
Phil Willoughby |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gperf] switch fallthrough |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:44:03 +0000 |
Hi Bruno, Marcel,
Thanks for working on this. While that patch fixes the problem with GCC7, it is
less flexible than the command-line flag in that it doesn't work for other
modern compilers and static analysis tools unless they use a C++17 standard
library or impersonate GCC.
I've attached a patch with the command-line variant to the pre-existing bug
report at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?53029. This allows us to use
our custom macro and have warning-free builds on clang/msvc/etc as well as GCC.
Phil
On 7/26/18, 3:14 AM, "Schaible, Marcel" <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Bruno,
thanks for the quick patch!
Kind regards
Marcel
________________________________
From: bug-gperf <address@hidden> on behalf of Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:05 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: Phil Willoughby
Subject: Re: [bug-gperf] switch fallthrough
Hi,
Phil Willoughby wrote:
> We would like a way to change what gperf emits when it’s falling through
> from one case to another in a switch block. At the moment we see
> /*FALLTHOUGH*/ and I did not find a command-line flag or inline
declaration
> that can alter that.
>
> The reason we’d like this is that we’re migrating to GCC 7 from 5 and
> we’re using the gcc flag -Werror=implicit-fallthrough.
Thanks for the suggestion. It's even possible to avoid the
implicit-fallthrough
warnings without a command-line option or inline declaration.
Implemented through this patch:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gperf.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d37a8763d9a5169ee2cb71a0281f859ca159b87
Bruno