|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#74386: Tree-sitter javascript indentation |
Date: | Mon, 2 Dec 2024 00:33:23 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 01/12/2024 21:10, Yuan Fu wrote:
Ah, I see. That’s a good point, and I definitely prefer the indentation result of parent-bol here. The one produced by standalone-parent is just wrong. What we can do is make standalone-parent ignore “.” when checking for “standaloneness”. And perhaps make it configurable so it’s enabled only for modes that this waiver makes sense (C-like languages excluding C and C++).
Maybe not by hardcoding this in inside the 'standalone-parent' matcher, but writing this in the indentation rules? Different languages might have differing ASTs for such construct.
Or if you meant to do a text search, a period might start a method call, but it could also continue a "range" literal in some other language, or some struct initializer (I think?) in C/C++. Also, some languages allow (and style guides suggest) to have the previous at the end of the line, then followed by newline and then the method name.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |