[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Recursive find in "ls" utility doesn't seem to always work...
From: |
Tim Schoenfelder |
Subject: |
Recursive find in "ls" utility doesn't seem to always work... |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:15:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701 |
Hi,
I manned the "ls" utility and it recommended reporting this to the above
email address.
My version of ls is:
ls --version
ls (fileutils) 4.1.9
Written by Richard Stallman and David MacKenzie.
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
My story:
I was attempting to find all of the *.exe files in a win95 cdrom
(troubleshooting an install on an older PC) so I tried the following
command:
ls -aR *.exe
while in the mounted CD's win95 directory. I also tried the above
without the "a" option with no luck. I even took the wildcard out and
used a specific filename such as
ls -aR wowkit.exe
which failed(reported nothing). However, when I used a blanked
recursive call through a pipe such as
ls -aR | grep wowkit.exe
reported
wowkit.exe
additionally
ls -aR | grep .exe
successfully reported all of the exe files on the cdrom. Could you
please help me fix this?
Sincerely,
Tim Schoenfelder
cc: Steve, a linux fluent friend...
- Recursive find in "ls" utility doesn't seem to always work...,
Tim Schoenfelder <=