Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-fileutils (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Jan 31 2003 13:57:05 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• January 31, 2003
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv display progress, David T-G, 13:57
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv display progress, Marty Leisner, 13:33
• January 30, 2003
  • [NOT A] Re: Bug in 'ls', David T-G, 20:51
  • RE: Problem with cp (copy), Mr. Phillip Kimble, 20:23
  • Bug in 'ls', Todd Geders, 20:23
• January 28, 2003
  • Re: bug while using du with > 80 gb directory tree..., Jim Meyering, 05:07
• January 27, 2003
  • bug while using du with > 80 gb directory tree..., RobBlond, 21:16
  • dd modifications, Eric Thomas, 12:42
• January 24, 2003
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), Bob Proulx, 01:12
  • Re: chmod refuses...., Bob Proulx, 00:38
• January 23, 2003
  • Re: ls --color in Windows 2000, Richard Dawe, 05:38
• January 22, 2003
  • ls --color in Windows 2000, Justin Randall, 22:07
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), David T-G, 09:52
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), David T-G, 09:45
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), Alfred M. Szmidt, 09:41
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), Alfred M. Szmidt, 09:40
  • RE: Problem with cp (copy), Mr. Phillip Kimble, 08:04
• January 21, 2003
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), David T-G, 22:56
  • Re: chmod refuses...., David T-G, 21:33
  • Re: Problem with cp (copy), David T-G, 21:21
  • chmod refuses...., root, 21:03
  • Problem with cp (copy), Mr. Phillip Kimble, 21:03
  • [PATCH] cp/mv display progress, Benjamin Schieder, 05:25
• January 17, 2003
  • -u or --update option is not working cp shell command, Udayan , 09:33
• January 16, 2003
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 12:36
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 11:20
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 11:14
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 11:07
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 09:33
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 07:36
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 07:35
  • Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 05:43
• January 15, 2003
  • Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 17:32
• January 13, 2003
  • Re: df bug, Bob Proulx, 00:08
• January 11, 2003
  • df bug, Andy Canfield, 21:48
  • Re: "mv --reply=no" surprising results, Clifford T. Matthews, 12:40
  • Re: "mv --reply=no" surprising results, Jim Meyering, 02:56
• January 10, 2003
  • "mv --reply=no" surprising results, Clifford T. Matthews, 19:33
  • Re: chmod help, Bob Proulx, 12:54
  • Re: bug???, Bob Proulx, 12:53
  • chmod help, Harsh Prakash, 09:49
  • bug???, Lou Lohman, 00:55
• January 09, 2003
  • Re: rm anomaly on symlinks with fileutils 4.1.9, Bob Proulx, 01:31
• January 08, 2003
  • Re: rm anomaly on symlinks with fileutils 4.1.9, Jonas Pasche, 23:45
  • feature idea -- initial inquiry, Tom Lord, 23:45
  • Re: rm anomaly on symlinks with fileutils 4.1.9, Alfred M. Szmidt, 13:16
  • rm anomaly on symlinks with fileutils 4.1.9, Jonas Pasche, 12:45
• January 04, 2003
  • Re: bugs in df [problem of fileutils or kernel?], Nico Schottelius, 19:21
  • Re: bugs in df [problem of fileutils or kernel?], Alfred M. Szmidt, 18:24

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc