Re: [CORRECTION] Unpriviledged DESTDIR install of su

[Bob Proulx]

Bernd Jendrissek <address@hidden> [2002-10-28 18:54:37 +0200]:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:12:08PM +0200, David T-G wrote:
> > That's great, and thanks for the contribution, but ... um, what does
> > this have to do with fileutils?  You probably should send this to the
> 
> Nothing whatsoever, other than that I thought coreutils had gulped up
> fileutils too.

I think David was commenting that you sent the report to the "wrong"
address.  Perhaps he was just too subtle? :-)

You sent your mail message to address@hidden and not to
address@hidden as you had probably intended since su was part of
sh-utils and therefore would normally have the reporting address of
bug-sh-utils and not bug-fileutils.  Those are still independent lists
(for a very short time yet) and have unique subscribers to each list.

Of course all three have been bundled into coreutils and so point is
moot into the future.

> Besides, it's fixed in 4.5.3 anyway.  Sorry for bothering the list(s) :)

Those are the best types, where things are already fixed.

Bob