[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ln -fs
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: ln -fs |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Sep 2002 11:32:48 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Thanks for the report.
Joe Catanzaro <address@hidden> [2002-09-08 09:31:06 -0500]:
> Dear ln maintainer,
>
> I've had some trouble with the link utility ln. For example,
>
> ln -fs file link
>
> doesn't force the symbolic link. But,
>
> ln -sf file link
>
> works fine.
Both work fine for me.
> My main concern is that ln -fs doesn't output an error letting me
> know that this isn't going to work. Do you have any plans to
> implement the -fs option in your next release of ln or possibly
> displaying an error message?
I cannot recreate your problem here. Can you submit a small example
that illustrates how we can recreate the problem? Include any details
such as the 'uname -a' output 'ln --version' output plus the exact
commands needed to recreate the problem.
Thanks
Bob
- ln -fs, Joe Catanzaro, 2002/09/08
- Re: ln -fs,
Bob Proulx <=