[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in behavior for cp in fileutils-4.1.1
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Change in behavior for cp in fileutils-4.1.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:28:56 -0700 |
> Thanks for reporting that.
> I've just added this to the NEWS file for 4.1.1:
>
> * mv (likewise for cp), now fails rather than silently clobbering one of
> the source files in the following example:
> rm -rf a b c; mkdir a b c; touch a/f b/f; mv a/f b/f c
>
> I'm not sure what behavior would be best in your case:
>
> touch a; mkdir d
> cp a a d
rm -rf a b c; mkdir a b c; touch a/f b/f; cp a/f b/f c; echo $?
rm -rf a d; touch a; mkdir d; cp a a d/; echo $?
I will only note that on both IBM AIX and HP-UX both of the above
commands return without failure.
How is
cp a/f b/f c/
different from
cp a/f c/; cp b/f c/
On initial reading it seems inconsistent to treat those cases
differently.
Bob