[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:27:00 -0700 (PDT) |
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:18:37 +0100 (BST)
> From: Edward Avis <address@hidden>
>
> What does POSIX say about 'rm -r FOO' and 'rm -r FOO/'?
If FOO is a symbolic link to a directory, then POSIX 1003.1-200x d7
says 'rm -r FOO' removes only the link FOO, and 'rm -r FOO/' removes
only the directory FOO/ (and all files underneath it). This relies on
the fact that rmdir("FOO/") removes the directory FOO/ (assuming it is
empty).
> If DOUGAL is a directory, then 'rm -r DOUGAL', 'rm -r DOUGAL/', 'rm
> -r DOUGAL//' and so on should all work.
That's right.
- Inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Edward Avis, 2001/09/12
- fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Jim Meyering, 2001/09/12
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Edward Avis, 2001/09/12
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Paul Eggert, 2001/09/12
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Edward Avis, 2001/09/13
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Jim Meyering, 2001/09/13
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Paul Eggert, 2001/09/13
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Jim Meyering, 2001/09/14
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Paul Eggert, 2001/09/14
- Re: fileutils: inconsistent behaviour stripping / from end of filenames, Jim Meyering, 2001/09/14