[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem with cp-command
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: problem with cp-command |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:30:59 +0200 |
address@hidden (Bob Proulx) wrote:
...
> Summary: As presently implemented in cp the -f does not override the -i.
>
> I am not sure that is the correct behavior though. Comments from
> others? Shouldn't -f override -i regardless of the POSIX
> documentation? I think that is the behavior on other systems but
> can't check right now.
Hi Bob,
Unfortunately, cp's -f has never affected -i (unlike e.g., mv's).
There's probably too much history to change it now.
- Re: problme with cp-command, (continued)
- Re: problme with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/05
- Re: problem with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/06
- Re: problem with cp-command, Bob Proulx, 2007/07/06
- Re: problem with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/06
- Re: problem with cp-command, Bob Proulx, 2007/07/07
- Re: problem with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/07
- Re: problem with cp-command, Bob Proulx, 2007/07/07
- Re: problem with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/07
- Re: problem with cp-command, Bob Proulx, 2007/07/07
- Re: problem with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/08
- Re: problem with cp-command,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: problem with cp-command, Peter Landgren, 2007/07/07