[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
From: |
vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ? |
Date: |
22 May 2007 19:57:07 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr
2007-05-22 20:57 -------
Fixing this "bug" may not be a good idea, because the build fails later for
another reason :
gcc ... readelf.c
../bfd/bfd.h:103:3: #error No 64 bit integer type available
There is also another bad smell : when running make just after running
configure without arguments, the following warnings are displayed :
$ make
make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/mtxt/binutils-2.17.obj'
mkdir -p -- ./libiberty
Configuring in ./libiberty
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
configure: WARNING: invalid host type:
configure: creating cache ./config.cache
Note that everything works perfectly on a filesystem in binmode.
Something surely goes wrong in the configure stuff when textmode is used.
It might be nice to fix the binutils so they can compile in textmode, but we
can be sure that there is a *lot* of other software that fails to be built in
textmode. The best solution may be to check for textmode at runtime, and fail
with an error message saying that the user must switch to binmode for compiling.
Furthermore, the Cygwin setup program itself clames that it is NOT RECOMMENDED
to use textmode...
Vincent
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/19
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, schwab at suse dot de, 2007/05/19
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/19
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/20
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, nickc at redhat dot com, 2007/05/22
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/22
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?,
vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr <=
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, nickc at redhat dot com, 2007/05/23
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, nickc at redhat dot com, 2007/05/23
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/23
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, nickc at redhat dot com, 2007/05/24
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, schwab at suse dot de, 2007/05/24
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, dj at redhat dot com, 2007/05/24
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/28
- [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?, vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr, 2007/05/30