[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command
From: |
Dale R. Worley |
Subject: |
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 2024 13:56:18 -0500 |
Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> writes:
> On 12/11/24 9:54 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>> This needs to be corrected to note that compound commands that are not
>> one component of a multi-command pipeline do not cound as pipelines for
>> setting PIPESTATUS. Exactly which compounds commands don't set
>> PIPESTATUS needs to be made clear as it's not at all obvious.
>
> I'll add something enumerating the commands that set PIPESTATUS.
Well, given that the documentation as written is that a solo compound
command is a pipeline and by implication sets PIPESTATUS, the edit is
actually "enumerating the commands that *don't* set PIPESTATUS if they
are the only command in a pipeline".
Dale
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Chet Ramey, 2024/12/10
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Dale R. Worley, 2024/12/11