[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?
From: |
Rene Herman |
Subject: |
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:00:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
On 12/14/2012 02:23 AM, gregrwm wrote:
shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?
No, that matches anything beginning with a slash, followed by one or
more groups of two characters. That is, followed by two characters, by
4, 6, and so on. If you had any 6 or 8 (or 9, or 12, or...) then your
first two examples would've shown the same behavior as your third. It
seems you just want "/??"
Rene.
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, (continued)
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/16
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?,
Rene Herman <=