RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:23 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
> 
> While I'm at it, should I remove all the
> #define SIG_xxxxxxx _VECTOR(y)
> since they are deprecated?

Please, no, do not remove SIG_* definitions.



> Ron: Consider it done. Since I don't need it for my project, I won't
> update in there, but when I'll commit to avr-libc tree it will be
> included. If you do need it, fell free to ask, I'll make a zip file
> and send you all the patched headers.
> 
> Sample:
> 
> /* External Interrupt Request 5 */
> #define INT5_num                     6
> #define INT5_vect                     _VECTOR(6)
> #define SIG_INTERRUPT5                 _VECTOR(6)
> 
> Note that SIG_xxxx and yyyy_vect are not always aligned. yyyy_vect and
> yyyy_num however are always aligned.

I'd like to see a final patch before it is committed.